Do bad report cards have consequences? Impacts of publicly reported provider quality information on the CABG market in Pennsylvania.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Since 1992, the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) has published cardiac care report cards for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery providers. We examine the impact of CABG report cards on a provider's aggregate volume and volume by patient severity and then employ a mixed logit model to investigate the matching between patients and providers. We find a reduction in volume of poor performing and unrated surgeons' volume but no effect on more highly rated surgeons or hospitals of any rating. We also find that the probability that patients, regardless of severity of illness, receive CABG surgery from low-performing surgeons is significantly lower.
منابع مشابه
Start spreading the news: a structural estimate of the effects of New York hospital report cards.
Research on the effects of publicly reported hospital quality report cards on patient market shares is mixed. Higher-ranking hospitals do not consistently experience increases in market share. We argue that this may be because the report cards do not always convey "news" about quality; in some cases the rankings conform with prior beliefs about quality. We develop a structural model of the "new...
متن کاملThe unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.
Health care report cards publicly report information about physician, hospital, and health plan quality in an attempt to improve that quality. Reporting quality information publicly is presumed to motivate quality improvement through 2 main mechanisms. First, public quality information allows patients, referring physicians, and health care purchasers to preferentially select high-quality physic...
متن کاملThe Role of Information in Medical Markets: An Analysis of Publicly Reported Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery.
1 During the past two decades, several public and private organizations have initiated programs to report publicly on the quality of medical care provided by specific hospitals and physicians. These programs have sparked broad debate among economists and policy makers. At issue is the question of whether, and to what extent, these " report card " programs have improved or harmed medical product...
متن کاملCalifornia provider group report cards: what do they tell us?
The objective of this study was to perform a practical assessment of publicly reported data from 4 reports on California provider groups through the eyes of the consumer. The study compared performance indicator content and rating methodologies, examined the degree of correlation in provider group performance on indicators common to 2 or more reports, and assessed the level of concordance among...
متن کاملDo markets respond to quality information? The case of fertility clinics.
Although policymakers have increasingly turned to provider report cards as a tool to improve health care quality, existing studies provide mixed evidence on whether they influence consumer choices. We examine the effects of providing consumers with quality information in the context of fertility clinics providing Assisted Reproductive Therapies (ART). We report three main findings. First, clini...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of health economics
دوره 30 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011